HyperSonic2003 wrote:
matthayter700 wrote:
HyperSonic2003 wrote:Ah, as in water electrolysis? I take it you mean to extract breathable oxygen from the water, right?
matthayter700 wrote:
HyperSonic2003 wrote:Actually, I'm not even sure if it's the case. I've just heard of it, and mentioned it as a reason I'm hesitant to think of hybrid cars as good for the environment.
Hybrids use different metals than nonhybrids? This I did not know. Thanks for that tidbit. As for electrolysis...we use that at NASA. Moon bases. Woo hoo! Shhh...you didn't hear it from me.
As for that "trust paying more money for something"...yea Madoff's is a different situation I know...but it involved trusting someone else with their money. I was saying that people might be mad if they pay higher taxes and don't see an outcome. Like the government pocketing the money straight up, you know? lol Surely they wouldn't do that though...right? :P
And just out of curiosity, what kind of electrolysis were you saying NASA used?
I've got the paper work somewhere around here...but yea...their looking into using it on the moon. To extract breathable oxygen and water from the lunar regolith.Moon bases here we come!
That is it exactly my good man. My wording was a bit off, huh? lol
Just making sure, though, since there's other kinds than water electrolysis. For all I knew you could've meant electrolysis of some melted-down compounds from lunar soil, or something like that, to yield water AND oxygen. Not even sure if such a thing is possible though o.o
) or else the good old-fashioned chip fat based
biodiesel that's being clamped down on over here (traffic police in some areas having been instructed to act on anything where the exhaust smells like a
chippy, since it won't have paid fuel tax 
?
